April Fools Shenanigans

Google are 'avin' a larf today. When you search for anything, it funnies up the time to search details in the return. 'Shakes of a Lambs Tail', 'jiffies' etc now replace .0 seconds.

Time to live blog April Fools 2010! Some of us got a jump start on the time-honored tradition (not to name any names here), but we still have about 24 hours of shenanigans left. As the new hire, I have the dubious honor of managing the TechCrunch April Fool’s Scorecard.
Media_httpfarm3static_wbjuc

Media_httpfarm5static_oztgk

Media_httpfarm5static_fokem

Media_httptctechcrunc_pjgds

The Madness of King Rupert . Paul Carr, Techcrunch.

"Moving its content behind a pay-wall will be the death of the Times; one of the world’s most respected newspapers and a British national treasure. Even with a relatively modest subscription cost of £1 ($1.60) a day or £2 for the whole week, it has been shown time and time again that the hassle factor of making even a small payment to access a website will result in a hemorrhaging of readers. Unlike the Financial Times (no relation), only a small fraction of the Times’ online readership do so for business reasons – with most incorporating it into their general news diet. If it’s no longer free they’ll simply get their news elsewhere."
Media_httptctechcrunc_chtxd

Plus a great take from Jeff Jarvis writing in the Guardian, and linked to in Paul's article:

"So to try to transpose old business models to this new business reality is simply insane. Just because people used to pay in print they should pay now – when the half-life of a scoop's value is a click, when good-enough news that's free is also a click away, when the new newsstand of Google and Twitter demands that you stay in the open, searchable and linkable? This argument I hear about paywalls comes from emotional entitlement (readers "should" pay – when did you ever see a business plan built on the verb "should"?), not hard economics."

Media_httpstaticguimc_pfkce

Photograph: Eddie Keogh/Reuters

Great article from Paul Carr on Techcrunch about News International's paywall ambitions. In the past I've not been to keen on Paul's writing on TC, finding it verging on the irrelevant and silly sometimes. But I think this is terrifically well written and argued. A top bit of journalism about appropriately enough the future of journalism.

I enjoyed it so much, it's one of those rare online news occasions I would have happily paid for it.

;-

The Seven Needs of Real-Time Curators

Media_httppulse2comwp_gcsjh

Qouted from post: "This is a guide for how we can build “info molecules” that have a lot more value than the atomic world we live in now. First, what are info atoms? A tweet is an atom. A photo on Flickr is an atom. A conversation item on Google Buzz is an atom. A Facebook status message is an atom. A YouTube video is an atom.

Thousands of these atoms flow across our screens in tools like Seesmic, Google Reader, Tweetdeck, Tweetie, Simply Tweet, Twitroid, etc.

A curator is an information chemist. He or she mixes atoms together in a way to build an info-molecule. Then adds value to that molecule.

So, what are the seven needs of real time curators?"

Brilliant post from Robert Scoble this morn. Inspirational start to British Summer Time, and the starting gun on a lot of late (working) nights methinks.

Social Media: The Choice of a New Generation

Media_httpweb1twitpic_gneav

Today's new forms of social media--Facebook, Twitter, blogging, Skype, texting, YouTube, Instant Messaging, and those indispensable smart phones--require follow-us-wherever-we-go rules, and they are changing as you read this! Social media = the new e-mail. These networking tools have exploded in consumer popularity in both the business and social worlds.

Interesting Huff Post article, some points a bit obvious to old-hands but a useful read nonetheless.

Cracking post from Trotty:

Michael Caine was making a film with Sean Connery and director John Huston.

They were on the set of ‘The Man Who Would Be King’.

Caine said to Connery, “Have you noticed how John Huston never gives us any direction?”

Connery said, “You’re right, he doesn’t.”

Caine said, “Go and ask him what’s going on.”

And Connery went over to Huston and said, “John, how come you never give us any direction about how you want us to play our parts?”

And John Huston said, “You only have to do that when you get the casting wrong.”

 

 

 

 

 

BlackBerrys Effectively Add 10 Days of Work a Year | BerryReview.com »

According to research performed by Nectar Business for its 2010 Small Business Awards BlackBerry use effectively adds 10 days of work a year for employees. They did this research in the UK surveying 1,000+ BlackBerry workers about the impact of BlackBerrys on their working lives.

Media_httpcdnberryrev_ibbsq

ps. I wonder if the picture above that illustrated the post is of real people? Surely they're not posed models from a cheesy photo library?

:-